The Holocaust

The murder of six million Jews by Nazi Germany, known as the Holocaust, is hard to contemplate. But it resonates – as it should – in our collective memory.

Started August 2016 | last updated May 2025 | 1,700 words | Contents

Note: This post is also a section in my post Racism explained – as a redundant instinct. It uses the words ‘anti-Jewish’ and ‘anti-Judaism’ instead of the inaccurate words ‘antisemitic’ and ‘antisemitism’.


The Holocaust
Top 🔼

Contents


The Holocaust

Contents 🔼

Introduction

There’s been anti-Jewish racism since the Jews’ most recent exile from Israel by the Roman empire, and their consequent dispersion throughout Europe.

Exile and diaspora is the conventional narrative – but apparently it’s more complicated than that. Apparently, historically, there was no expulsion two thousand years ago.

But however it came about, Jewish diaspora communities lived in Europe. They lived mainly in productive harmony with host communities, but cynical anti-Jewish rabble-rousing led to outbreaks of racist violence, or ‘pogroms‘; and Christian and Muslim extremism led to persecution and expulsion.

The Granada massacre of 1066, a Muslim pogrom in which approximately 4,000 Jews were killed, marked the end of centuries of peaceful coexistence with a liberal Muslim regime in Spain.

The final Christian reconquest of Spain in the late 1400s led to approximately 2,000 Jews being murdered by the Spanish Inquisition and to the eventual expulsion from Spain of over 50,000 Jews.

Savage pogroms continued all over Europe until as recently as the 1940s.

16th-century Christianity reformer Martin Luther publicly recommended the burning of synagogues. Protestant Luther’s beef with Judaism was supposedly theological – but his bitter hatred betrays something less ethereal.

image
Reformer and anti-Jewish racist Martin Luther | Painting: Lucas Cranach the Elder

(Ironically, Luther’s modern namesake, Protestant minister and black civil rights leader Martin Luther King, publicly spoke out against black anti-Judaism. He acknowledged Jewish participation in the civil rights movement and he actively – controversially – supported the state of Israel.)

Encouraged by the original Luther’s widely disseminated anti-Jewish rhetoric, 19th-century German ‘race’ theorists and philosophers ramped up the anti-Judaism.

The 19th-century German ‘race’ theorists invented the pseudoscientific word ‘antisemitic’. (See my post about that ridiculous word for a tragic phenomenon, Antisemitism – anti-what??)

German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is often accused of anti-Judaism. However, that reputation was created by his sister Elizabeth Förster-Nietzsche, who edited his works after his mental breakdown in 1889 and his death in 1900.

Nietzsche’s sister systematically falsified his writings to match her own virulent anti-Jewish racism. Nietzsche was arguably a protofascist, but he was deeply contemptuous of anti-Judaism and nationalism.

Förster-Nietzsche’s falsifications have since been corrected, but they were current in the 1920s and 30s. The main fakery was in Förster-Nietzsche’s collection of her late brother’s notes, published in 1906 as a book, The Will to Power.

Luther and Förster-Nietzsche were perpetuating derogatory stereotypes of Jews common in Europe for centuries, as exemplified in literature by Shakespeare’s Shylock and Dickens’s Fagin.

For instance, the ‘blood libel’ was a widespread anti-Jewish slur which – ridiculously – accused Jews of murdering Christian children to use their blood in the baking of Passover bread.

Such stereotypes found ultimate expression in the fake but influential 1903 document, The Protocols of The Elders of Zion, which purported to reveal – in great detail – a Jewish plot for world domination.

The Protocols of The Elders of Zion was exposed as totally fraudulent in the early 1920s, but it was taught as factual to schoolchildren in 1930s Nazi Germany. It’s still touted around amongst modern conspiracy theory enthusiasts. (David Icke thinks the ‘Elders of Zion’ are extradimensional beings.)

Anti-Jewish prejudice, unlike most other forms of racism, isn’t colour prejudice. It’s not a reaction to people’s skin colour – it’s white-on-white prejudice.

As with Islam, Judaism is a religion, not a ‘race’. But, although Judaism contains different ethnic strands, the European Jewish diaspora can be said to be a ‘population’, like African or South Asian people. In the social construct sense, they’re a ‘race’. But they’re not a population easily identifiable by appearance. So how does the prejudice arise?

Anti-Jewish prejudice must be a form of culturist racism: specifically – historically – prejudice against the Jewish diaspora, where people of a different culture came to live in or near a settled neighbourhood, not as individuals but as a self-contained community.

Such Jewish diaspora groups arrived at established communities throughout Europe as fringe communities. Romani travellers, also known as Gypsies, who kept moving rather than settling, were similarly outsiders – and were similarly wiped out in the Holocaust.

Jews – like Gypsies – are voluntarily outsiders, not wanting to integrate but keeping to themselves and to their own culture. This marks them out for prejudice – in that being different means being seen as a threat.

The cultural differences are actually harmless – Jews aren’t actually plotting to rule the world – it’s the difference itself that causes fear, probably mainly unconsciously, which manifests as racism.

Culturism, of course, works one way. Racism is power plus prejudice, so the power is with the European majority and the prejudice is against the outsider minority.

(Culturism, as well as underlying white-on-white anti-Judaism, probably also boosts white-on-black colour prejudice, in that a different skin colour indicates a different culture.)


The Holocaust

Contents 🔼

The Holocaust

European anti-Judaism climaxed in the 1940s in Nazi Germany with the Holocaust, Adolf Hitler’s insane, genocidal ‘final solution to the Jewish question’.

Hitler’s anti-Jewish fascism was boosted by:

  • Widespread, centuries-old European anti-Jewish stereotypes and culturist racism
  • The anti-Jewish writings of German uber-Protestant Martin Luther
  • Racist 19th-century German pseudoscientific ‘race’ theory
  • The protofascist ‘übermensch‘ writings of German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche
  • The anti-Jewish falsifications by Nietzsche’s fascist sister, Elizabeth Förster-Nietzsche in his posthumous book, The Will to Power.
  • The 1903 document The Protocols of The Elders of Zion, exposed as fake in the 1920s but taught as factual in German schools in the 1930s
  • Racist, pseudoscientific US eugenics programmes funded by the Carnegie Institution, the Rockefeller Foundation and John Kellogg.

Nazi Germany’s increasingly brutal 1930s anti-Jewish campaign ended in genocide when Jews were sent to extermination camps. In the death camps, the German state systematically murdered six million Jews.

Between 150,000 and 1.5 million Romani people were also murdered by the state.


The Holocaust

Contents 🔼

How could they do that?

For those of us who oppose racist anti-Judaism, the Holocaust’s meticulously organised murder of six million Jews haunts our imagination. It’s difficult to understand how people could have done that.

In 1961 the trial of high-ranking Nazi Adolph Eichmann took place in Israel. Eichmann, who’d been instrumental in organising the Holocaust, famously said he’d merely obeyed orders.

Yale professor Stanley Milgram, a US Jewish social psychologist, heard about Eichmann’s defence and posed this question:

    What is there in human nature that allows an individual to act without any restraints whatsoever, so that he can act inhumanely, harshly, severely, and in no ways limited by feelings of compassion or conscience?
    My bolding

Milgram then conducted a famous and controversial series of ingenious experiments – with shocking results.

Milgram showed that ordinary people in thrall to white-coated authority figures were willing to inflict what they believed to be severe pain and even death on strangers. (The strangers were played by actors.)

Questions have understandably been raised about the ethics and methodology of Milgram’s experiments. Their relevance to the Holocaust has been questioned. But Milgram’s basic findings still hold true.

The Holocaust authority figures themselves must have had some form of empathy-deficient mental disorder such as psychopathy. But more disturbingly, ordinary people in that situation were able to set aside their empathy.

Perhaps, however, the Holocaust executioners were not only acting in innate obedience to authority figures, as suggested by Milgram’s experiments, but were also indulging an instinctive racist urge.


The Holocaust

Contents 🔼

After the Holocaust

Ironically, extreme nationalism – a main factor in the Holocaust – is now a charge made against the powerful US-backed state of Israel in its ongoing conflict with Palestinian people, many of whom were expelled from their homes and homeland during the controversial establishment of Israel which began in 1948.

Equally ironically, the number of Palestinian people registered as refugees (in 2025) is six million. (There are about seven million Jewish people living in Israel.)

Following an attack on Israel in October 2023 by Hamas, the militant group running the Palestinian Gaza Strip, Israel launched the one-sided Gaza ‘war’ against Hamas during which many tens of thousands of Palestinian civilians, including children, have been killed or seriously injured by the IDF – the Israeli ‘defence’ forces.

Mahmoud Ajjour, nine, lost both arms during an Israeli attack on Gaza City | Photo: Samar Abu Elouf / New York Times

The International Criminal Court (ICC) accused the Israeli premier of war crimes and crimes against humanity, and – in the final irony – Israel was accused of genocide.

Supporters of the Palestinian cause who criticise Israeli Zionism are accused (perhaps correctly in some cases) of anti-Jewish racism. And so it goes.

Also, showing no one’s immune, there’s Jew-on-Jew racism in Israel, in particular against Ethiopian Jews.

A Sephardi (Jews of North African origin) chief rabbi reportedly said there could be no explanation other than ‘pure racism’.

Outside Israel, despite the terrible lesson of the Holocaust, anti-Judaism continues to thrive.

A 2008 report by the US department of state found there was an increase in anti-Judaism across the world, and both old and new expressions of anti-Judaism persisted.

A 2012 report by the US bureau of democracy, human rights and labor noted a continued global increase in anti-Judaism, and found Holocaust denial and opposition to Israeli policy were used to promote or justify anti-Judaism.

The German government has paid over $90bn in compensation to the victims and survivors of the Holocaust and their heirs.

Contents 🔼

The End

Amazingly, some Gazans still support Hamas

Begun January 2025 | 1,600 words | Contents

Seeing defiant Hamas fighters on TV during the January 2025 hostage releases, I wondered if, given the havoc Hamas has provoked, Gazan people still supported them. Amazingly, some did.

Hamas fighters pictured during a hostage release | Photo: Reuters

Top 🔼

Contents

Introduction
What do Gazans think of Hamas?
Hamas hoped to spark regional war
Donald Chump’s Nazi plan for Gaza
The future for Gaza and Hamas
Addendum:
Western support for Hamas


Amazingly, some Gazans still support Hamas
Contents 🔼

Introduction

The horror

We western liberals looked on in horror as the news broke of the brutal October 2023 attack by Hamas. We continued looking on in horror and frustration as news of the even more brutal Israeli war on Gaza rolled on.

Our frustration was due to the powerlessness of the international community. The so-called United Nations (with its veto-hampered Security Council) was more toothless than usual as its US paymaster continued to give unconditional support to Israel and the lawless IDF – the Israel ‘Defense’ Forces.

Some western support for the Palestinian cause shaded into misplaced support for Hamas. (See below.) That didn’t help.

In November 2024 the International Criminal Court (ICC) issued an arrest warrant against Israeli premier Benjamin Netanyahu. The court accused Netanyahu of war crimes and crimes against humanity:

ICC charges against Netanyahu

War crimes

  • Starvation as a method of warfare
  • Intentionally directing an attack against the civilian population

Crimes against humanity

  • Murder
  • Persecution
  • Other inhumane acts

The Israeli military used those criminal tactics to destroy Gaza whilst trying to destroy Hamas. But, as shown in the January 2025 hostage release videos, Hamas wasn’t destroyed – they were still there.

Hamas was still there – and making a point of looking in charge. But given their deliberate provocation of Israel’s destructive response, I wondered: what did battered Gazan civilians really think of Hamas?


Amazingly, some Gazans still support Hamas
Contents 🔼

What do Gazans think of Hamas?

Open criticism

Video of hostages being released by Hamas fighters
19 January 2025 | Forbes

In videos of hostages being released during the ceasefire that began in January 2025, the Hamas fighters in charge displayed a defiant and confident ebullience.

That display suggested buoyant support for Hamas in Gaza – or a cowed population. Gazan civilians were reportedly cowed – as might be expected under the rule of Hamas’s ultra-sharia political-Islamist government.

In the 2006 election in Gaza, Hamas won against the more moderate Fatah by 37 to 32 percent. International observers said the election was ‘open and fairly contested’.

However, an electoral system described as ‘skewed’ meant Fatah got no seats. A unity government was formed but in 2007 it collapsed when Hamas ousted Fatah by force and imposed authoritarian rule.

(The US and the EU, considering Hamas to be a terrorist organisation, didn’t accept the 2006 election result. A 2021 election due in Gaza and the West Bank was postponed indefinitely by Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas.)

A June 2024 US Foreign Affairs article by security expert Audrey Cronin said:

    Hamas rules Gaza through oppression, using arrests and torture to suppress dissent. Gazans widely loathe its internal General Security Service, which surveils and keeps files on people, stamps out protests, intimidates journalists, and tracks people accused of “immoral acts”.

As for popular support for Hamas in Gaza, it was sinking rather than buoyant. A September 2024 poll found that although 39 percent of Gazans still supported Hamas, that had fallen in three months from 64 percent.

A July 2024 UK BBC News article said:

    Open criticism of Hamas has been growing in Gaza, both on the streets and online. Some have publicly criticised Hamas for hiding the hostages in apartments near a busy marketplace, or for firing rockets from civilian areas.

The BBC article quoted an educated Gazan man speaking angrily on video about the Hamas leadership:

    I am an academic doctor. I had a good life, but we have a filthy leadership. They got used to our bloodshed, may God curse them. They are scum! We could have avoided this attack.

    Quote from a video (apparently no longer available) of a man, his face and clothes covered with blood, speaking outside a hospital filled with hundreds of casualties after an Israeli operation to free hostages from central Gaza.

Distressed Gazan civilian criticising Hamas | Screenshot of viral video, June 2024 | Photo: UGC

A senior Hamas government employee, who asked to remain anonymous, told the BBC the Hamas attack was a ‘crazy, uncalculated leap’. He said:

    The Hamas government prepared well for the attack militarily, but it neglected the home front. They did not build any safe shelters for people; they did not reserve enough food, fuel and medical supplies.

The BBC article concluded:

    Criticism of Hamas is growing sharper, and long-buried divisions over Hamas rule in Gaza are becoming clear. Out of the destruction left by Israel’s battle with Hamas, a new war is emerging: a battle for control of public opinion within Gaza itself.


Amazingly, some Gazans still support Hamas
Contents 🔼

Hamas hoped to spark regional war

Daft as a brush

What did Hamas think would happen when they launched their October 2023 attack?

The attack – a brutal assault on a lightly defended peacenik kibbutzwasn’t, as might be thought, an unplanned outburst. Despite the assault’s shambolic execution, training and planning had been going on for weeks. So what was the purpose?

The attack by Hamas was apparently intended to spark regional war. A Hamas spokesman said the attack was intended to provoke a strong Israeli response and a consequent regional war against Israel.

The regional war didn’t happen – and had no chance of happening. Middle Eastern Muslim countries may support Palestinian resistance groups with money, weapons and training, but they have no interest in waging war against Israel, the US-backed regional superpower.

In fact some regional Muslim countries, including well-armed Saudi Arabia, had been busy establishing diplomatic links with Israel.

Was the Hamas leadership – perhaps made gullible by ideology – misled by callous regional partners into believing the attack would result in war? Did Hamas expect Palestinian victory, with Gazan deaths being glorious martyrdom?

Did Hamas think embeding themselves amonst Gazan civilians would deter Israeli aggression?

Whatever their thinking, Hamas’s childish strategy – poking the angry Zionist bear and then hiding amongst civilians – inevitably caused Gazans to suffer mass death, injury, destruction and displacement for – as Hamas should have realised – an unachievable end.

In spite of that, a December 2023 poll found only 19 percent of Gazans blamed Hamas for their post-attack suffering. That showed a stubborn loyalty – but Gazans deserved better.


Amazingly, some Gazans still support Hamas
Contents 🔼

Donald Chump’s Nazi plan for Gaza

Insane in the brain

It could be said the Hamas attack succeeded in raising the profile of Gaza and the wider Palestinian cause – but raised it to what end? There was still no prospect of Israel being persuaded to accept a two-state solution or to end its aggressive settler expansion.

Also, unfortunately for Gaza, its raised profile caught the eye of rampaging newly re-elected US president Donald Chump.

Within weeks of his January 2025 inauguration, Chump announced an insane Nazi plan for Gaza. The US would take control and ownership of Gaza, deport the people and turn it into a Middle Eastern Mar-a-Lago.

Chump embroidered the plan, but his team got the original idea from a July 2024 paper given them by rightwing economist Joseph Pelzman. (Apparently Pelzman offered it to team Biden first, but – understandably – they didn’t want it.)

Prof Pelzman’s highly detailed but quite bonkers paper said – in summary – that reconstructing Gaza would be too costly and the only solution was to remove the people, level the ground and start from scratch. He specified a tourist seafront. Chump the real estate moron must have loved that.

Pelzman said the country carrying out his plan should be granted a 50-year lease. Typically, Chump took that to mean the US should assume ownership of Gaza.

Anyone hoping Chump has a tiny spark of sanity or conscience should watch his gobsmacking Nazi-propaganda-style AI-generated Chump Gaza video. He clearly hasn’t got a spark of anything worthwhile.

To be fair to Chump (even a narcissistic sociopath deserves that), his bullying style apparently brought about the Gazan ceasefire and hostage releases that began in January 2025.

But that ceasefire was an incidental silver lining to Chump’s deliberate cloud of confusion and crisis. Chump talks cheesily about wanting peace, but his real concern is to ensure he and his felllow-billionaires can continue profiteering from crisis.

(Candidate Chump promised to ‘drain the Washington swamp’, but he and his parasitical class – served, ironically, by ‘swamp’ lobbyists – are actually draining the economy, hollowing it out to enhance their obscene wealth.)

Ceasefire update | March 2025
To keep power, Benjamin Netenyahu, Israeli premier and wanted war criminal, reneged on the second part of the ceasefire agreement, in which all hostages were to be be freed and all Israeli forces were to leave. Instead, the mass death and destruction resumed. Idiot Chump colluded with Netenyahu’s return to war. Reuters reported that after a White House meeting with released Israeli hostages on 5 March Chump posted:

    I am sending Israel everything it needs to finish the job, not a single Hamas member will be safe if you don’t do as I say. Also, to the People of Gaza: A beautiful Future awaits, but not if you hold Hostages. If you do, you are DEAD! Make a SMART decision. RELEASE THE HOSTAGES NOW, OR THERE WILL BE HELL TO PAY LATER!

    My bolding (Chump’s caps!)

Most of the ‘people of Gaza’ – distiguished by Chump’s ‘also’ from Hamas – had nothing to do with the holding of hostages. Threatening civilians with death is a war crime.


Amazingly, some Gazans still support Hamas
Contents 🔼

The future for Gaza and Hamas

Better leadership

Best friends: the war criminal and the psychopath | Photo: Reuters

Donald Chump and his new pal, rightwing Israeli premier and wanted war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu, would presumably have to drop their fantasy Nazi ethnic-clearance ‘Riviera’ plan for Gaza.

In which case, if and when the Israeli military left Gaza, a caretaker government could supervise reconstruction – and would need to implement elections.

Hamas’s stupid strategy inevitably brought nothing but death and destruction to the people of Gaza. Gazans deserve better leadership – one that pursues the Palestinian cause but also protects civilians.

Despite its show of defiance in the hostage videos, Hamas seemed a spent force. Whether at the hands of the avenging Israeli military or a dissatisfied Gazan electorate, Hamas’s days in power were surely numbered.

Seaside genocide | Photo: AP/Getty


Amazingly, some Gazans still support Hamas
Contents 🔼

Addendum

Western support for Hamas

Terror error

As well as still having some support in Gaza, Hamas had some support in the liberal west, where righteous support for the Palestinian cause sometimes shaded into misplaced support for the Islamist group.

Here in the UK, for instance:

  • In a 2009 speech, Jeremy Corbyn, leader of the Labour Party from 2015 to 2020, gullibly described Hamas as:
      …an organisation that is dedicated towards the good of the Palestinian people and bringing about long-term peace and social justice and political justice in the whole region
  • Ismail Patel, zealous Muslim founder of UK political-Islamist campaign group Friends of Al-Aqsa (listed as an extremist group by the UK government in March 2024) has made speeches at UK Palestine demonstrations unconditionally praising Hamas for standing up to Israel.
  • In 2024, foolish Leicester Muslim campaigner Majid Freeman was charged with the terrorism offence of supporting Hamas online. (In 2021, the political and military wings of Hamas were proscribed as a single terrorist organisation by the UK.)

Hamas’s extremism and recklessness harmed the Palestinian cause. However, some international supporters of that cause continued to support Hamas as a legitimate response to Israeli oppression.

Such misguided support would no doubt encourage Hamas as it clung to power.

The End
Top 🔼
Feel free to comment. (I answer all comments.)

Antisemitism: anti-what??

image
SuperSemite?
Illustration: Michael Capozzola

During campaigning for the 2016 London mayoral election and ever since, much media coverage has been given to accusations of racism against Labour party members whose expression of support for the Palestinian cause and criticism of Israeli Zionism had allegedly shaded into anti-Jewish racism.

The media coverage inadvertently highlighted a problem with the word used to describe that racism –  ‘antisemitism’. We know what it means  – but it doesn’t mean what it says. Call me pedantic, but Arabs are ‘Semitic’ as well as Jews, aren’t they? So why do we use the word to refer only to anti-Jewish racism?

The dodgy origin of the word ‘antisemitic’ is instructive. The word was invented by 19th-century German proto-Nazi ‘race’ theorists to provide a scientific-sounding substitute for the word they were using: ‘Judenhass‘, meaning Jew-hatred.

‘Semite’ (derived from the biblical character Shem, one of the sons of Noah) was a term in use then – but now considered obsolete – for people who speak Semitic languages.

330 million people currently speak Semitic languages. The world’s Jewish population is 14 million.

Hebrew and Arabic are both Semitic languages. So, in the original (now obsolete) meaning of the word, Arabs and Jews are indeed both Semitic. It’s therefore ironic – and ridiculous – that supporters of (Arab) Palestine accused of anti-Jewish racism are described as antisemitic. After all, no one calls Jewish people Semitic people.

The word ‘antisemitic’ is clearly pretentious and racist pseudo-scientific nonsense. Nevertheless, despite having been disputed as inaccurate and misleading since the 1930s, it’s been in common use ever since.

Racism is a difficult enough problem without complicating it with linguistic tripwires. (See my analysis of racism, Racism explained as a redundant instinct.)

Information about the offensive and deceptive origin of this mealy-mouthed misnomer is easily available. Continuing to shelter behind its bland euphemism is a lazy and bad habit.

We should say what we mean. Anti-Jewish racists should be called ‘anti-Jewish‘. Anti-Jewish racism should be called ‘anti-Judaism.

I put this to some Jewish anti-racism campaigners. Disappointingly, the replies all said the same thing: it’s an irrelevant and confusing distraction from the cause.

Admittedly, addressing this issue would mean making costly changes to campaign names, websites and literature.

However, words matter. The continuing use of the confusing misnomer ‘antisemitic’ will continue to muddy the debate. Perhaps campaigners and their supporters should accept some transitional cost and confusion for the sake of long-term clarity.


Top 🔺

Please feel free to comment